<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tim Latham &#187; Mixing in the box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://protools-mixing.com/category/mixing-in-the-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://protools-mixing.com</link>
	<description>Protools Mixing by Tim Latham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 03:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Audio Mastering and other updates</title>
		<link>http://protools-mixing.com/2011/02/audio-mastering-and-other-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://protools-mixing.com/2011/02/audio-mastering-and-other-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tlatham7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIx Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mixing in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Latham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protools-mixing.com/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Audio Mastering and other updates It’s been a while since I’ve blogged but I’m back. I’ve been extremely busy (thankfully) mixing while I’ve been trying to expand my studio to offer a greater depth of services. I’ve also been working to complete by mix engineer handbook as well as get the finishing touches together for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audio Mastering and other updates</p>
<p>It’s been a while since I’ve blogged but I’m back.  I’ve been extremely busy (thankfully) mixing while I’ve been trying to expand my studio to offer a greater depth of services.  I’ve also been working to complete by <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">mix engineer handbook</a> as well as get the finishing touches together for my <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">online audio mixing school</a>. There were a few but significant technical hurdles to conquer in an effort to ensure that the clients experience would operate as smoothly and as quickly as possible.  Beta testing soon.</p>
<p>I’m in the early stages of offering <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">audio mastering</a> as well as mixing services to my clients.  I’ve been asked too many times to ignore the question any longer.  I spent time researching mastering software that I could incorporate into my recording studio so I could take advantage of my analog gear as well as all of my hardware and my expansive plug-in collection. I’m comfortable with the balance I’ve struck.</p>
<p>I’ve also updated my pro tools rig to a Mac Pro with a dual 8-core processor with 12gig of ram as well as Pro Tools 9.  There is always too much time spent converting from the old to the new, but it’s crucial that it’s done correctly.</p>
<p>I’ve been working with a lot of interesting independent artists lately who are not afraid to take chances and are making some bold musical statements.  It’s an enjoyable time for music and an exciting time for me as I venture into the unfamiliar world of mastering.  I’ve been working on a bunch of EP’s and singles for itunes and a very big full cd live album release, my confidence growing with each project.  While I’m extremely comfortable mixing, I’m getting there with my mastering abilities. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://protools-mixing.com/2011/02/audio-mastering-and-other-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro Tools Recording Session</title>
		<link>http://protools-mixing.com/2010/06/pro-tools-recording-session/</link>
		<comments>http://protools-mixing.com/2010/06/pro-tools-recording-session/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 01:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tlatham7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIx Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mixing in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Latham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio Enginer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protools Mix Engineer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protools-mixing.com/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I’m back from England having finished 5 weeks of recording The Kanyu Tree at Angelic Studios and it’s fair to say that pro tools/daw’s have changed the way in which records are made forever.  This has been true for a while, but this record has point a fine point on this sentiment.  This is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I’m back from England having finished 5 weeks of recording <a href="http://www.myspace.com/thekanyutree">The Kanyu Tree</a> at Angelic Studios and it’s fair to say that pro tools/daw’s have changed the way in which records are made forever.  This has been true for a while, but this record has point a fine point on this sentiment.  This is the bands first record so they didn’t have the history of the limits of analog recording so they were free to explore all of the options available to them to make the record that they wanted to.  Tempo has always been an issue when making records.  What works live doesn’t always work on record.  Natural timing pushes and pulls give recorded music it’s human feel.  While locking everything to a grid is appropriate sometimes, it occasionally takes the heart out of a song. This was the biggest challenge on this project.</p>
<p>The producer and the band liked some sections of some songs to be locked solid to a grid, but other sections felt too stiff.  We tried recording the songs at several tempos and then edited the sections together, each having it’s own tempo.  But some songs still didn’t “feel” right.  The answer came in the form of elastic audio.  We averaged out the tempos, recoded the song to a click at one tempo and had the flexibility to change tempos of different sections using <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">elastic audio</a> until the song worked as a whole.  While certain sections felt good at a specific tempo, but when the song played through some of the sections still needed to be tweaked just a bit to get the whole song to feel right.  I’ll state the obvious by saying that this was inconceivable before daws/pro tools came along.</p>
<p>Also, some of the arrangements are huge with many layers of vocals and guitars that would have taken tons of bouncing down and comping to make room for further overdubs.  We had the luxury of experimenting with varying arrangements thanks to the massive track count in pro tools.  Being that I wasn’t sure if I would be the mix engineer for the project, I made sure that the tracks were cut n a way that would allow for maximum flexibility during the mix.  The quick example is that I made sure to take a dry di signal on all of the guitars and bass for the purpose of re-amping.  Being that I am indeed mixing the record I’m glad that I thought of the <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">mix engineer</a> when recording.</p>
<p>Having spent much of my time over the past years mixing, I had a pretty clear picture in my minds ear of how I though the record would sound when finished.  By getting better at mixing, my <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">recording engineer</a> skills have also improved as well.  I have a pretty good sense of how different instruments blend together in a mix so I’m able to record them in a way that facilitates the mixing process.  Keeping the final mix in mind as I’m recording helps me tremendously when it comes time to mixing as I hope that when other engineers mix tracks that I’ve cut find that there is less damage control going on and just having fun with the balances and imaging.  It was a tremendous experience working with such a talented team and using all of what<a href="http://protools-mixing.com/"> pro tools</a> has to offer to cut an awesome record.  On to mixing……</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://protools-mixing.com/2010/06/pro-tools-recording-session/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genres and Career Possibilities</title>
		<link>http://protools-mixing.com/2010/03/genres-and-career-possibilities/</link>
		<comments>http://protools-mixing.com/2010/03/genres-and-career-possibilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tlatham7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIx Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mixing in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Latham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mix in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protools-mixing.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’d like to start this  by having the you ask yourselves a question:  How long of a career do you want to have as a mix engineer?  It takes quite some time to become a good mixer and to build a resume.  But to do so built on a single genre in my estimation will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d like to start this  by having the you ask yourselves a question:  How long of a career do you want to have as a mix engineer?  It takes quite some time to become a good mixer and to build a resume.  But to do so built on a single genre in my estimation will shorten your career.  An engineers life cycle is “Who’s Tim Latham?&#8230;Get me Tim Latham!!&#8230;Get me someone just like Tim Latham!!!…<em>Who’s</em> <a href="http://protools-mixing">Tim Latham</a>?”</p>
<p>No matter how successful you become, there will be someone new who wants your gig.  I highly recommend that you, the aspiring mix engineer, try to work on as many genres as possible.  This is a difficult task because as you become proficient and successful in a particular style, you’ll get more work in that style, and it&#8217;s difficult to turn away work.  This is not a bad thing, but a good situation.  Success breeds success.  But try to think a few years ahead and set goals.  What might be popular today might not be popular a few years from now and your name will be connected with a fad that’s passed.  You will become pigeon-holed whether you like it or not.  It is a challenge to diversify, especially when considering the city in which you work.  There aren&#8217;t too many country records being cut in New York.  If you are living in a city where one genre is the bulk of the work, you have a challenge ahead of you.  If it means taking a few low/no paying gigs in an unpopular genre on the side, take them.  Take them and build your discography.  Your mixes are your business cards.  There have been very successful engineers that have had great, long lasting careers working in a single genre, but you can increase your odds by expanding your resume.  The sad truth is that often your work as an engineer is often overshadowed by sales or lack of sales.  There are mixers who get a lot of work based off the hits that they’ve been involved with, sometimes with less than stellar work.  You might be a great engineer, but you might be overlooked (for a while) due to lack of sales.<br />
I think that it’s even more important now to be diverse and competent in a wide range genres due to declining overall sales and even more importantly, because genres are being mashed together with great ease thanks to <a href="http://protools-mixing">pro tools</a> and daw’s in general.<br />
You should strive to be a great <a href="http://protools-mixing">mix engineer</a>, not a great”___” engineer.  Bruce Swedien is my favorite example, as well as being one of my heroes.  His work has spanned decades and many genres and he is one exceptional mixer and a great guy to boot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://protools-mixing.com/2010/03/genres-and-career-possibilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listening to your favorite mixes</title>
		<link>http://protools-mixing.com/2010/01/listening-to-your-favorite-mixes/</link>
		<comments>http://protools-mixing.com/2010/01/listening-to-your-favorite-mixes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tlatham7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIx Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mixing in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protools Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protools Mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mix in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Latham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protools-mixing.com/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a beginning mix engineer, I found a few records that I loved the way they sounded. Some of them being Earth Wind and Fire’s “All n All”, Donald Fagens “The Nightfly” and Peter Gabriels “So”. You should try to find a record that you really love and use it as a reference when mixing. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a beginning <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">mix engineer</a>, I found a few records that I loved the way they sounded.  Some of them being Earth Wind and Fire’s “All n All”, Donald Fagens “The Nightfly” and Peter Gabriels “So”.  You should try to find a record that you really love and use it as a reference when mixing.  Don’t try to copy every part of I, because that is an impossible task.  There are literally thousands of decisions that go into the sound of a mix, including all of the thousands of decisions that went into the recording process.  Choice of mic, mic placement, mic pre, compression, eq, room, etc… on often 40-70 instruments adds up to a lot of decisions during the recording process.  And an equal amount of decisions go into the mixing process.  So to try to replicate what a <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">mixing engineer</a> has done to arrive at a mix is difficult if not impossible.  I am suggesting using a song or a record as a reference of the overall balance, sound or mood.  Also, it’s important to develop your own style.  Pick your record and close your eyes and listen.  Listen to a lot of records.  Listen to the relationship between the rhythm track and the vocals.  Figure out which of the harmonic instruments (keys, guitars etc…) are more “up front” and which are tucked in/back.  These relationships are important because they create dimension.  Borrow different sounds or uses or reverb that create these dimensions in your mixes.  And don’t be too concerned about genre.  It’s actually incredibly useful to be able to cross reference instruments across genre lines.  I can’t stress the importance of listening to as many records as you can from as many genres as you can handle.  (There are some genres I can’t listen to, but they’re very few).  Happy listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://protools-mixing.com/2010/01/listening-to-your-favorite-mixes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another decade as a Mix Engineer</title>
		<link>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/12/another-decade-as-a-mix-engineer/</link>
		<comments>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/12/another-decade-as-a-mix-engineer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tlatham7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIx Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mixing in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protools Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protools Mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio Enginer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mix in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Latham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protools-mixing.com/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As this decade comes to its inevitable conclusion, I ask myself, well, how did I get hear?  What a long strange trip it’s been I must say.  It started out with me living in TriBeCa, actually purchasing my first cell phone (I can hear the laughs from hear) and using pro tools only casually, to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As this decade comes to its inevitable conclusion, I ask myself, well, how did I get hear?  What a long strange trip it’s been I must say.  It started out with me living in TriBeCa, actually purchasing my first cell phone (I can hear the laughs from hear) and using pro tools only casually, to finishing it with my own blog, a couple of cell phones, a website to run, and a full blown pro tools mixing studio in a house out in the burbs of NYC.  As the next decade begins I find myself mid-way through my 3rd decade of life inside a recording studio.  With nearly 24 years years of studio time, I realize that I’m starting to become a competent mix engineer.  I said it. I, <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">Tim Latham</a> has finally become a competent <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">mix engineer</a>.  I did resist the full switch to a daw until I was sure that I could get similar results from one that I could with tape.  When pro tools hd was released and de-bugged, I was sold.  Some have called it the <a href="http://protools-mixing.com">home studio</a> revolution but I think it was more evolution.  With budgets sinking faster than Jay Lenos ratings and real estate prices skyrocketing combined with the cost of daw’s coming down to about 1/10th their digital reel to reel counterparts, it was nearly impossible for studios to keep their doors open.  Home studios began to fill the void of the closed rooms.  A few great tracking and mixing studios have survived to this day (thankfully) and a few new, smaller rooms have opened up as well.  In a rare moment of foresight, I saw the end of big room studios coming to an end and dove head first into the industry standard <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/">pro tools</a>, and built a mix room in my house in an effort to survive.  Some of my colleagues weren’t too happy with my decision, claiming that I was becoming part of the problem (<a href="http://protools-mixing.com/protools-mixing/mixing-pro-tols-in-the-box/">mixing in the box</a> is still taboo to many mixing engineers) but I have bills to pay and I wasn’t going to throw away at that point close to 20 years of experience as well as years in college on principal.  And I was wholly qualified to do absolutely nothing else.  So I dedicated a lot of time money and effort to get my studio up to speed as well as re-learning how to mix.  So as a new decade dawns upon us I am remiss to hazard a guess about what the future holds after seeing the tumultuous decade of the aughts.  But I will guess that the <a href="http://protools-mixing.com">recording studio</a> business won’t change all that much, with a few big rooms managing to stay open and smaller rooms like mine will continue to offer great quality mixes.  The monetizing of recorded music will figure itself out.  And I can only hope that there is a cultural sea-change amongst consumers who feel that free music is their right.  While I really want a Ford GT, if I took one off the lot of my local dealership because I felt that it was my right to have one I’d wind up in prison doing 1-5 for felony grand theft.  I am hopeful.  A bit nervous (nothing like a touch of fear for motivation!)  And I am also very grateful that I’m still invited into peoples dreams for a living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/12/another-decade-as-a-mix-engineer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mixing Demos</title>
		<link>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/12/mixing-demos/</link>
		<comments>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/12/mixing-demos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tlatham7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIx Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mixing in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protools Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protools Mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio Enginer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mix in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Latham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protools-mixing.com/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When mixing a demo, treat it like you’re trying to beat Sgt. Peppers or Pet Sounds or any of your favorite recordings.  Any mix engineer worth their weight in patch cables should never put anything less than 100% into their demo mixes or rough mixes.  There are numerous instances in my career as a mix [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p>When mixing a demo, treat it like you’re trying to beat Sgt. Peppers or Pet Sounds or any of your favorite recordings.  Any <a href="http://www.protools-mixing.com">mix engineer</a> worth their weight in patch cables should never put anything less than 100% into their demo mixes or rough mixes.  There are numerous instances in my career as a <a href="http://www.protools-mixing.com">mix engineer</a> where the rough mix was as good as if not better than the final mix.  As mixers, we tend to get in our own way when attempting to make a mix perfect.  I find that it’s often the imperfections in demo mix or rough mix that give a record its charm.  There certainly are instances where the arrangements are far too complex nail a mix when doing a rough.  Mixing records that are complicated require much more time to realize than an hour or so.  But there are plenty of occasions when putting together a rough mix that the mix kind of falls into place.  Sometimes its unconscious and there is something to be said for that.  It’s a good tool to have as an <a href="http://www.protools-mixing.com">audio engineer</a>, that tool being the ability to “get out of your own way”.  Also remain conscious of the fact that there is always a chance that the rough or the demo might become the actual record.  Never underestimate your own abilities when mixing demos.  Mix every song, be it a demo, a rough mix or a final mix as if it’s going to be the one that get’s you the Grammy award.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/12/mixing-demos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mix Engineer</title>
		<link>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/11/mix-engineer/</link>
		<comments>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/11/mix-engineer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tlatham7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIx Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mixing in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Mixing updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protools Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protools Mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio Enginer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mix in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protools-mixing.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The role of a mix engineer and how it&#8217;s evolved: When I was starting out in recording studios, the role of the mix engineer was fairly well defined. A few weeks of lock-outs (24hr. sessions) were booked at a studio of choice, the tapes arrived a day before starting, the multitrack machines were aligned, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #000000;">The role of a mix engineer and how it&#8217;s evolved:  When I was starting out in recording studios, the role of the <a href="http://protools-mixing.com">mix engineer</a> was fairly well defined.  A few weeks of lock-outs (24hr. sessions) were booked at a studio of choice, the tapes arrived a day before starting, the multitrack machines were aligned, and all of the extra outboard gear was hooked up and tested.  On day one the mixer would arrive, set up their effect sends and returns and the mixing would begin.  Typically, a day to a day and a half were required to complete a mix.  At the end of a mix, the assistant would document everything in the room.   Everything.  Every setting on every piece of outboard gear was written down.  It was very tedious and extremely important to get all of it 100% correct because this documentation was used to recall a mix at a later date to make some very minor changes.  There would be a recall or two and the mixes were then sent off to a mastering studio.  The<a href="http://www.protools-mixing.com"> mix engineer</a> mixed.  There was an occasional overdub, but the mix engineer was just that.  The role has now evolved to a combination of a few disciplines.  The mixer now is an editor, a vocal tuner, arranger along with the role as mixer.  I have embraced these extra responsibilities with gusto.  The speed in which I am now able to work in <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/how-protools-mixing-works/">pro tools</a> is exponentially faster than the analog days.  It is by no means cutting corners, but hours a day are saved alone by not having to sit idle as 2 24track machines rewound and locked back up.  That time is now used for the editing and tuning which I feel gives me a bit more insight into each song.  Digging into the structure of the song bridges the left brain to the right brain.  For me, mixing is a battle between the two halves and having that occasional bridge to cross is beneficial in giving each half a break every once in a while.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/11/mix-engineer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vocal Microphone Technique</title>
		<link>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/11/vocal-microphone-technique/</link>
		<comments>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/11/vocal-microphone-technique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tlatham7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MIx Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mixing in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Mixing updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protools Mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mix in the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mixing Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protools-mixing.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First and foremost, vocals are the most important element in modern music, with the obvious exception being instrumental music. The drums are the motor that drives a mix and the vocals are the navigator. One of the biggest challenges as a recording engineer is the get a great vocal sound. To start, the most appropriate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First and foremost, vocals are the most important element in modern music, with the obvious exception being instrumental music.  The drums are the motor that drives a mix and the vocals are the navigator.  One of the biggest challenges as a <a href="http://protools-mixing.com/how-protools-mixing-works/">recording engineer</a> is the get a great vocal sound.</p>
<p>To start, the most appropriate microphone should be chosen, not the best.  Often the most expensive tube microphone will not sound as good on a particular voice as an inexpensive condenser mic.  If given the luxury, set up 3 mic&#8217;s next to each other and have the singer run through the song acapella.  Switch between the three mic in the control room (make sure the singer doesn&#8217;t have headphones on, this will drive them crazy) and one of them should jump out as the obvious choice.  One chosen, have the singer run through a verse or chorus with their headphones on and listen to how the sound of the vocal &#8220;sits&#8221; in the track.  No that you&#8217;ve picked the appropriate microphone, it&#8217;s time to place it.  First, raise the mic to the height of the singer&#8217;s mouth.  Then flatten your hand and hold it parallel to the ground and place in between the capsule and the singer&#8217;s mouth.  This is usually a good distance to start from.  Finally, place a pop filter in between the mic and mouth and you&#8217;re ready to record.</p>
<p>What does this have to do with <a href="http://www.protools-mixing.com">mixing records</a>?  Well, we don&#8217;t spend all of our time as audio engineers mixing.  A well recorded vocal will make your life exponentially easier when it comes time to mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://protools-mixing.com/2009/11/vocal-microphone-technique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

